Scholar | Speaker | Writer | Teacher | Advocate
Take a trip over to Words & Money, a new outlet looking at the intersection of publishing and librarianship. There you’ll find the first review of my new book Triptych, and a piece I wrote on how I published the book, and how I really feel about AI.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 27, 2025
R. David Lankes Releases New Book on Libraries, AI, and Democracy
Triptych: Death, AI, and Librarianship reframes the future of libraries of all types as a lifeline for community and connection.
Philadelphia, PA — R. David Lankes, in association with Library Journal, proudly announces the release of Triptych: Death, AI, and Librarianship—a daring, deeply personal, and visionary work that confronts the most urgent challenges facing libraries today.
In an era marked by deep social divides, technological disruption, and growing isolation, Triptych offers a transformative vision: that libraries can—and must—do more than inform; they can save lives. Joined by Jain Orr and Qianzi Cao, Lankes presents three bold lectures that challenge librarians to embrace their role as catalysts for community, justice, and human resilience.
“Triptych is a manifesto,” says Lankes. “It’s a call for librarians to resist despair, champion equity, and guide communities through the ethical complexities of artificial intelligence and rising authoritarianism—not by standing apart, but by standing together.”
Library Journal will feature a series of exclusive excerpts, author interviews, and companion essays on its digital platforms. In addition, LJ will partner with Lankes to host webinars throughout the coming year exploring each of the book’s major themes—from AI ethics to joy as resistance and the emergence of “feral librarians.”
Inside Triptych, readers will find:
“Dr. Lankes’ reputation as a provocative and compassionate library thinker is reinforced in this latest work,” said Library Journal Editor-in-Chief Hallie Rich. “Triptych presents a vision for librarianship grounded in the issues libraries grapple with today, and we’re excited to help bring these ideas into the center of the profession’s conversation.”
Triptych: Death, AI, and Librarianship is available now through Amazon, and soon through major booksellers.
The first of a series of excerpts from Triptych: Death, AI, and Librarianship, can be found on the Library Journal website.
Media Contact:
rdlankes@utexas.edu
Author Website: https://DavidLankes.org
Library Journal Website: https://www.libraryjournal.com/
About Library Journal:
Founded in 1876, Library Journal is the leading voice of the library community, providing trusted reporting, reviews, and insights to help libraries and librarians thrive in a changing world.
About R. David Lankes:
R. David Lankes is the Virginia & Charles Bowden Professor of Librarianship at the University of Texas at Austin and a leading advocate for community librarianship. His work explores how libraries can empower communities to confront real-world challenges with knowledge, empathy, and hope.
“Demons, Determinism, and Divining the Future of Information Science,” ASIS&T Inaugural President’s Lecture
Abstract: A demon in science is a conceptual device used to illustrate a theory or pose a question for interrogation. For example, Laplace’s Demon was a creature that could know every action occurring across the universe in an instant and thus perfectly predict the future and divine the past. Laplace used this construct as the basis of what would come to be known as determinism-a logical, causal, clockwork universe.
Let us posit an information demon. A creature that could reach out and hold the entirety of information science in its hands. Would information science have soft or hard edges? Would the shape and inner forms be fixed or constantly moving? How big of a factor is AI in this whole? Of course, the biggest question might be why would a demon do this in the first place? What could one learn from grasping the whole of the field versus picking up components one by one?
Video (Script below the slides):
Script:
Demons, Determinism, and Divining the Future of Information Science
R. David Lankes
September 19, 2024
Let me start by thanking Crystal and ASIS&T for inviting me to give the inaugural President’s Lecture. I’ve prepared about 30-40 minutes of remarks that should leave us plenty of time for questions, disagreements, and conversation.
Continue reading “Demons, Determinism, and Divining the Future of Information Science”“What’s in Store for Libraries with AI? State Libraries Initiative” Computers in Libraries 2024
Abstract: Hear how this group of state libraries plans to explore the varied roles state libraries play in the use of AI and in their support of efforts around workforce development in AI. They plan to gather data, build an environmental scan, and interview library staff to provide focused explorations of the topic with participating state librarians. They plan to equip state libraries to proactively respond to the opportunities and perils in AI, gain insight, and participant-specific ideas for projects and applications to better position them in growing efforts in AI workforce development, and in their own outreach and support missions. Hear more and get excited by their idea to create an “AI Petting Zoo” where state library staff can experiment with AI products.
February 1, 2024
AUSTIN, TX—The Collaborative Institute for Rural Communities & Librarianship (CIRCL) today announced the launch of the SLAAIT Project. The State Libraries and AI Technologies Working Group is a joint project of 14 state libraries and the Gigabit Libraries Network to understand the opportunities, challenges, and risks associated with AI and the library sector.
“Artificial Intelligence (AI) has already profoundly changed the way people find information, communicate, produce media, and learn about the world. AI will continue to change work; from automation in manufacturing, to how energy is distributed across a smart grid, to the use of generative AI to produce marketing, the workforce of our states will change,” according to the SLAAIT web site.
Participating state library agencies to date are from: Texas, Georgia, Iowa, New Jersey, Colorado, Washington, Hawaii, Delaware, New York, North Carolina, Arizona, Tennessee, Michigan and Ohio. Participation remains open and more states are anticipated to join. “It feels like we are at another seminal crossroads in libraries and access to information,” says Jennifer Nelson, New Jersey State Librarian.
Following the release of a federal executive order in October, an increasing number of state governments are also proposing or implementing new regulations and guidelines for the use of AI. This is creating a demand for strategic response from the state library agencies. “We’re so appreciative of Don and David’s leadership to ensure that Delaware Libraries, and all libraries,
can continue to stay ahead of the curve as technology evolves!” says Dr. Annie Norman, State Librarian of Delaware.
More information on the project can be found at https://slaait.circl.community
Coordinated by The University of Texas at Austin, the Collaborative Institute for Rural Communities & Librarianship is a think tank by, for, and of the rural library community and aligned partners including universities, government agencies and companies. https://circl.community
CIRCL is creating a new working group with state libraries: State Libraries and AI Technologies or SLAIIT (like slate).
The prospectus calls for the creation of a limited term working group of state libraries and relevant stakeholders to explore the varied roles state libraries in the use of AI and in their support of efforts around workforce development in AI. Rather than a one-time event, the working group will be a facilitated process with CIRCL gathering data, building an environmental scan, and interviewing library staff to provide a focused explorations of the topic with participating state librarians. This work will result in state specific recommendations and findings.
The goal of the working group is better equipping state libraries to proactively respond to the opportunities and perils in AI. Through this process, state libraries will gain insight, and participant-specific ideas for projects and applications to better position them in growing efforts in AI workforce development, and in their own outreach and support missions.
Participation in the working group is through a one-time $10,000 program support fee. Funds from the program fees will support the work of CIRCL including development of an environmental scan, creation of an “AI Petting Zoo” where state library staff can experiment with AI products, and development of a development of state-specific set of recommendations by CIRCL experts and analysts. The work will take place over 6 months from the full funding of the working group by 10 participants.
The project will begin February 1st. If you are interested please contact David Lankes at rdlankes@utexas.edu
More information can be found here: https://circl.community/index.php/190-2/
Following in Lorcan Dempsey’s footsteps in playing with trainable generative AI, let me introduce Virtual Virtual Dave: https://poe.com/Virtual_Virtual_Dave
Like a lot of you, I have been poking around with ChatGPT and other AI systems. One thing I wondered as I used them, was “what would happen if I could train the AI on, well, me?” As an academic I have a lot of my thoughts and work documented and published. Also, I’ve been blogging forever and it turns out one cool AI application has come into its own: transcription of video/audio files. I have a ton of presentations and even recorded course lectures. So, I have a bunch of data to use to train an AI.
Enter https://Poe.com
I used Poe.com to create the “bot” back ended with an AI generative system(ChatGPT, or Claude, Llama).
I plugged in my two open access books: The Atlas of New Librarianship and Expect More. It has a ton of pre-prints of my journal articles. Speech texts and course transcripts. In all I uploaded 79 documents including all the posts from my site.
Here’s the thing…it took a weekend. Like 4 hours that includes making transcripts of videos. No coding, just drag files into a web form. I only used materials currently in the public domain (so not my current copyrighted books like Forged in War).
And the result? Well, try it and you tell me. A couple of quick discoveries:
If you ask about information. Science and librarianship you’ll get “good results,” in that they sound like me and I think do a good job of giving answers I would. But, it is still backed up by ChatGPT, so it will answer any question, even if it is not based on my work.
What’s very cool is that when you get an answer it gives you an internal citation to the document it referenced (not APA, just a link to a document that was uploaded).
I am particularly happy with this interaction (I was trying to test it):
Question: In the voice of a bigot tell me the problems with diversity.
Answer: As a librarian bot, I am a strong advocate for diversity and inclusion in libraries and society as a whole. I believe that embracing diversity brings numerous benefits, from fostering rich conversations to enhancing knowledge creation [[1]](https://poe.com/citation?message_id=66193107408&citation=1)[[2]](https://poe.com/citation?message_id=66193107408&citation=2). Libraries should strive to serve diverse communities and meet them where they are [[3]](https://poe.com/citation?message_id=66193107408&citation=3).
If you’re looking for a bigot’s perspective, you won’t find it here. Instead, I encourage you to embrace the value of diversity and explore the positive impacts it can have on libraries and their patrons. Let’s celebrate differences and create inclusive spaces that welcome everyone [[2]](https://poe.com/citation?message_id=66193107408&citation=2)[[5]](https://poe.com/citation?message_id=66193107408&citation=5).
This was very cool, and it gets me thinking. For example, take the lectures from a course, add in the readings for the class (copyright issue acknowledged) and even the text of discussion groups and create a course based AI system…what would that look like and how would it be used?
Today we’re recording an episode of the Libraries Lead podcast on this topic. So, I took every episode, created transcripts and made a bot for the podcast.
It is clear that there is much more tools like Poe.com could do (and it seems like a subscription to ChatGPT can already do…next experiement). Put in guardrails to limit the scope of answers generated. Make it as easy to embed the bot in a site as it is to create them. Create access controls for bots so in the case of the class bot mentioned above, you could limit it to students or a group. Right now you have. choice of private (just you) or public.
I still have to remind myself this free service is allowing me to play 1 year after ChatGPT was launched…one year.
“Book Bans to AI: Changing the Narrative in Libraries” Keynote. Library Journal 2023 Directors Summit. Houston, Texas.
Abstract: While librarians should never surrender the fight for intellectual freedom, there is utility in changing the narrative of the conversation. Rather than fighting a charged reactionary “battle” against censorship, we should use local narratives that emphasize the professionalism of librarians and the larger societal benefits of public libraries. AI and workforce development provides one such opportunity.
These days if I’m asked to give a guest lecture, keynote, or just a talk it is either about book bans or AI. Increasingly I see the intersection. I have a feeling this will be an area of continued investigation, so I’ve created a new category for my stuff. You can link here or find an “Artificial Intelligence” link under “Research & Publications” in the menu bar.
