NSF Awards Syracuse Team Grant on CI Facilitators

Jeffrey M Stanton, Elizabeth D Liddy, Derrick Cogburn, Megan Oakleaf, and R. David Lankes are co-PI’s on a new NSF grants entitled: CI-Facilitators: Information Architects across the STEM Disciplines. Paul Gandel, SU’s CIO also deserves a large portion of the credit for the grant.

What does this have to do with participatory librarianship? Well, read the description:

Cyber-Infrastructure – broadly defined to include the web, wireless grids, parallel processors, lap-tops, cell phones, mainframes, telecommunication networks, etc – has become the informational substrate of most dynamic enterprises. Databases, statistical datasets, data ware-houses, sample libraries, and image collections are just a few of the myriad examples of massive scale information collections that e-researchers dependent on information must create, maintain, and share In addition, some of the most innovative information use is now in the form of collaboration technology that facilitates the development of geographically distributed sites and networked communities within and across traditional divides.

Yet in e-research scholars have three serious problems facing them. First, researchers spend their careers mastering the skills, knowledge, and tools that comprise the core of their respective disciplines. Few among them have the capacity to simultaneously become experts in information management, networking, virtual or distributed collaboration, search and retrieval, archiving, user interface development, and all of the other skills of the information professions. Second, advances and convergences in Cyber-Infrastructure that have occurred over recent decades have themselves fueled a vast proliferation of information – more findings, more datasets, more papers, more conferences, more journals, more books and so on. Even the brightest and most motivated struggle to keep up with the rapid pace of knowledge creation in their field. Finally, information infrastructure itself is in the process of an accelerating evolution. Gains in computing power, storage, transmission bandwidth and other fundamental building blocks of Cyber-Infrastructure create frequent discontinuities in the economics of information technologies, while open source software tools sprawl daily into innovative new application territories. The rapid pace of development of information infrastructure implies that only individuals who dedicate their professional lives to it can truly keep up.

One solution to these issues is the preparation of “cyber-infrastructure facilitators.” These are information professionals able to partner with e-research teams to identify extant data and tools, as well as build new tools in the pursuit of research topics.

Sounds like a good participatory librarian working in the digital world to me.

Information Technology, Participatory Librarianship, and Educating LIS Professionals

“Information Technology, Participatory Librarianship, and Educating LIS Professionals” Rutgers MLIS Colloquium, New Brunswick, NJ.

Abstract: The American Library Association’s Office for Information Technology Policy (OITP) has named its first Fellow: R. David Lankes of the Syracuse School of Information Studies. Professor Lankes will speak about how the concept of participatory librarianship can build on Web 2.0, Libraries 2.0, and similar trends to give direction to the future of the profession.
Slides: https://davidlankes.org/rdlankes/Presentations/2008/Rutgers.pdf
Audio: https://davidlankes.org/rdlankes/pod/sRutgers.mp3
Video: http://ptbed.org/downloads/smallRutgers.mov

First Issue of Conversants Now Available

The first issue of Conversants is now available at http://conversants.syr.edu

While articles will be added as they are accepted, the first release has the following:

Editorial
Making library schools smarter
– Andrea Mercado

Artiles
When the conversation goes “meta”: Organizing knowledge in collaborative online environments
– David M Pimentel

A New Approach to Understanding the Digital Divide : Why two levels are not enough
– Todd Marshall

Essays
The Knowledge Base for a Participatory Library (Google Video)
– Keisuke Inoue

And a report on a meeting about Web 2.0 in the LIS Curriculum:
Colleagues converse about technology change, curricula

Please come and read, comment and participate.

Systems, Conversations and Participation

“Systems, Conversations and Participation” Innovative Interface’s Academic Library Director’s Conference, Berkeley, CA.

Abstract: Social is the rage across the Internet. Social bookmarking, social tagging, social networks. But what is social and why does it matter? Can we just make something, like a library social? How can concepts such as community conversations clarify the mission of the library and help direct us in how we build systems for today and tomorrow? David’s presentation will explore aspects of social computing and present underlying concepts of, what he terms, “participatory librarianship”. He will seek to go beyond today’s Web 2.0 buzz words and explore ways that today’s librarian can be effective and necessary in today’s “social” world.
Slides: https://davidlankes.org/rdlankes/Presentations/2008/iii.pdf
Audio: https://davidlankes.org/rdlankes/pod/sf.mp3
Video: http://ptbed.org/downloads/IIIBig.mp4

Reference Renaissance: the VRD Successor!

I am so excited. The reference movement that grew up around the VRD conferences has put together a new conference:

“The Reference Renaissance is sponsored by BCR (Bibliographical Center for Research) and RUSA (Reference and User Services Association, ALA). BCR’s dynamic President and CEO, Brenda Bailey-Hainer is chairing the conference committee. The committee is a group of vibrant library professionals who recognized the vacuum that was created when the Virtual Reference Desk (VRD) series of 7 conferences ended in 2005. The Reference Renaissance conference fully embraces and builds on the legacy of the expanded VRD mission to create a forum of LIS professionals, researchers, and students to explore all the facets of today’s reference service array, including traditional and virtual reference environments.”

Not that this group in any way needs my endorsement, but they certainly have it. The VRD years were an incredible time in my life, and (being bold) an incredible time in the evolution of reference. A movement grew up of talented practitioners and researchers out to change the world. In the intervening years, I have witnessed the folks in that movement keeping up the pace of innovation. So it is great to see a showcase for their work.

It is great to see our VRD legacy continue. Of course it will only continue if we actually show up. So go. Don’t only plan on going, put in a session (call for participation below). Reference is not dead, and the golden days of VRD were only the beginning if we put our travel and conference dollars to work. There is power in showing up, and there is power in place. In San Antonio I called upon the entire VRD community to join me in a mission. A mission to engage in our profession and improve it. Lately I have talked about the obligation of leadership and the important of innovation. Let us once again convene, plot and inspire. See you in Denver.

Call for Participation

A Reference Renaissance: Current and Future Trends
August 4-5, 2008
Denver, CO
Conference website:
http://www.bcr.org/referencerenaissance

Sponsored by BCR (Bibliographical Center for Research) and
RUSA (Reference and User Services Association), an ALA Division

Rumors of the “death of reference” have been greatly exaggerated! Reference and information services now encompass not just traditional forms such as in-person point-of-service, telephone, and e-mail, but also Instant Messaging, Text Messaging (SMS), blogs, wikis, library pages on MySpace and Facebook, and virtual reference desks in Second Life.

A Reference Renaissance: Current and Future Trends conference will explore all aspects of reference service in a broad range of contexts, including libraries and information centers, in academic, public, school, corporate, and other special library environments. This two-day conference will incorporate the multitude of established, emerging, and merging types of reference service including both traditional and virtual reference. It presents an opportunity for all reference practitioners and scholars to explore the rapid growth and changing nature of reference, as an escalating array of information technologies blend with traditional reference service to create vibrant hybrids.

Our theme of a “Reference Renaissance” was taken from an editorial by Diane Zabel, in a recent issue of Reference and User Services Quarterly (winter 2007). Zabel wrote of a “resurgence of interest in reference” and that “reference is experiencing a regeneration, a reference renaissance.”

Submissions of papers, panels, and workshop proposals are welcomed that analyze issues, identify best practices, advance organizational and technological systems, propose standards, and/or suggest innovative approaches that will reveal as well as invent the future of reference in this exciting and unfolding landscape. The conference will be organized around the following interest tracks. Please note that the sub-bullets are intended to be suggested topics, not to be a comprehensive listing.

  • Virtual Reference (including e-mail, chat, IM, SMS, Second Life, etc.)
  • Interpersonal aspects of reference service across different types of service
  • Comparison of VR modes
  • Innovative Service Models (including face-to-face, outreach, and Web 2.0)
  • Comparison of different modes (locations, configurations, etc.) of service delivery
  • Social networking applications (such as blogs, wikis, Facebook, MySpace, etc.)
  • Case studies in virtual outreach
  • Satellite (or outpost) reference, roving reference
  • Managing Reference Services
  • Assessment/Evaluation (including guidelines and best practices, benchmarking performance, service quality, accuracy, effectiveness, and efficiency)
  • Hiring, training and motivating staff in an era of rapid change (including performance issues)
  • Marketing initiatives
  • Approaches, Values, & Philosophy of Reference Services
  • Reference as teaching
  • How much help to give (e.g., homework, course assignments)
  • Wild Card (including, but not limited to, controversial issues, comparisons, other innovative topics – be creative!)
  • Sustainability and budgeting issues
  • Reference consortia issues
  • Software and hardware development
  • Vendor (including demonstrations and workshops)
  • Vendor software and hardware development

TYPES OF SUBMISSIONS:

  1. Papers (500 word abstracts): include reports and research studies on any aspect of reference, user studies, evaluation projects, innovative practical applications, theme papers, or theoretical developments. In addition, works in progress and student papers are invited. Submissions should include: 1) a cover sheet with the paper title, author(s), contact information and affiliations(s) for each author, conference track(s) and 2) a second page consisting of a 500 word abstract that summarizes the paper but does NOT show your name or any contact information. Papers will be refereed by the program committee.
  2. Panels: include proposals for 1.5 hour long sessions on topics such as reference innovations, implementation of new technology, evaluation projects, reports by practitioners on current initiatives, theme panels, and contrasting viewpoints on controversial or hot issues. Innovative formats are sought, especially those that encourage audience participation, such as: roundtable discussions, debates, forums, or case studies. Submissions should include: panel title, names, affiliations, and contact information for all participants (moderators, panelists, respondents, etc.), conference track(s), and a brief overview (250 words) of the issues, projects or viewpoints to be discussed. Panels will be refereed by the program committee.
  3. Workshops, Demonstrations, and Reports from the Field: include proposals for 30 minute sessions on working projects, new services, new approaches to reference instruction, or to developments-in-progress. These can be educational in nature. Submissions should include workshop of demonstration title, names and affiliations of all participants, contact information, conference track(s), and brief overview (250 words) of the session.

DEADLINES:
April 4, 2008 Deadline for All Submissions
May 5, 2008 Notification of Acceptance to Speakers

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS:
Submissions should be sent in electronic format (as an e-mail attachment as a Word document or pdf) to Program Chair Marie L. Radford ([email protected]).

Information on conference registration and hotel reservations will be forthcoming on the
conference website at: www.bcr.org/referencerenaissance

More Catholic Video

If the slides are boring and you really want to see the presenter (and either you are really bored or a stalker), Catholic has posted the video of my presentation here”

http://digitalmedia.cua.edu//events/video/asx_dsp.cfm?event=4005&stream=4305

This is the same presentation I posted before, but you get to see me (stop it, you’re scaring me).

They have some great presentations here:

http://slis.cua.edu/people/video.cfm